Types of Divorce

January 27th, 2012

A divorce is a divorce, right? Well, according to legal practice in Utah and other states, there are actually a number of different types of divorces. With custody and/or the division of property involved in most divorces, there are many factors to be considered in the judge’s verdict.  Here are the basic categories a Utah divorce can be put in:

At-fault divorce: In the beginning, before recent law changes made divorce so much simpler, there were only at-fault divorces. There had to be actual grounds for divorce, in which one party had committed some act that was sufficiently damaging to the marriage to qualify.

No-fault divorce: At first meeting with a great deal of opposition, the no-fault divorce was eventually passed into law in all 50 states and D.C. New York, surprisingly the last to follow suit, eventually made this type of divorce available. In no-fault divorce, either party can request a divorce without explaining that the other had an affair, or something of that nature, but can simply claim “irreconcilable differences.”

Uncontested divorce: Regardless of fault or no fault, a divorce in which the respondent does not fight with the petitioner for the divorce, it is called an uncontested divorce. In this type of divorce, the parties agree on custody, property, and support factors.

Contested divorce: This is an all-too common form of divorce. One partner files and requests things to be a certain way and the other vehemently disagrees, leading to a lawyer vs. lawyer divorce case.

Collaborative divorce: This is when two parties, with the help of lawyers and a commitment to not go into a contested divorce, are able to come to an agreement in the divorce case.

Summary divorce: This is perhaps the simplest form of divorce, available mainly to those with little assets or a brief marriage. These couples do not have much to divide or do not have children to share custody with.

Mediated divorce: Finally, mediated divorce is a divorce in which the parties share the cost of a mediator, in lieu of more expensive lawyers, and with the mediator’s help agree on all the terms of the divorce. This is preferable to a contested divorce and parties are encouraged to at least attempt mediation.

History of Divorce Around the World

January 18th, 2012

It seems that in almost every pivotal political change, we look first to the ancient Rome and Greek cultures to see how they dealt with similar issues and what were the results. On the subject of divorce, the Roman saying was, “matrimonia debent esse libera”, meaning that “marriages ought to be free”.

While this would seem to make divorce exceptionally common, it was not. Family members, in the interest of preserving the sanctity of the family, would prevent most marriages from ending in divorce by helping, or coercing, the distressed couples to work it out.

In old Islam, in the 15th century, divorce was surprisingly common. In Egypt, Al-Sakhawi looked into the practice of divorce and found that of 500 Egyptian and Syrian women interviewed, one-third had married more than once.

In Europe, during medieval times, the Church had all authority over marriages. While divorce was disallowed, annulments and separations were nonetheless common. The term “divorce a mensa et thoro” (“divorce from bed-and-board”) referred to separations in which a husband and wife moved into separate places and, while refused a divorce, were committed to no longer cohabiting from that point forward. Annulments were only granted for cases of marriages considered invalid in the first place.

In Japan, from 1600 through the late 1800s, women were not allowed to seek a divorce. Only men could do so by writing a letter of divorce. Family often intervened to try to help the couple work it out, as family permanence was highly valued.

If a woman was in a seriously bad marriage, she could only seek sanctuary in Shinto divorce temples, as they were called, and after several years could then be granted a divorce. Yet, by the 19th century, Japan had caught up with the rest of the world and had a divorce rate of 1/8th of all marriages. Today, most developed countries have some of the highest divorce rates in their recorded histories, and the trend seems to be relatively stable worldwide.

History of Divorce in the U.S.

January 12th, 2012

In early United States history, divorce was considered a matter of religious consideration and importance. As marriage was considered a binding lifelong contract, the very idea of divorce was rejected by most religious sects from colonial life and beyond.

Eventually, following the Reformation, the non-Catholic regions began to recognize divorce as more of a civil matter, and while the marriage vows were still held sacred, civil courts claimed the right to end marriages as deemed necessary.

Still, for literally centuries, the only validated requests for divorce were for such serious claims as infidelity, abandonment, and extreme cruelty. Anything less was considered an unworthy case for divorce and was rejected by civil courts.

In the 17th century, as the 13 colonies were beginning the transition to 50 states,  inebriation and impotence were also included in just causes for divorce. But the state assumed that the survival of the marriage was preferable. Thus the petitioner for the divorce had to prove the need for it.

In the mid 1900’s, the no-fault divorce was first invented, but it was amidst great controversy. Proponents claimed that many would be freed from hopeless marriages, while opponents claimed that the no-fault laws would just make divorce a rampant problem in the United States. Some no-fault reasons include long-term separation, incompatibility, and loss of sanity.

Judges of the 1950’s and 1960’s adhered to the fault-based divorce laws.

In the 1970s, the no-fault divorce became official and soon spread throughout the entire nation’s state laws. With the no-fault divorce added into law, the 1980s saw a peak in divorces. 50% of all marriages ended in divorce, primarily using the no-fault divorce laws. Today that number has lessened somewhat, but remains close to half of all marriages performed in the United States.

Riverton Man Sues Wife’s Lover

January 2nd, 2012

A marriage of nearly 17 years, and two children ages 16 and 14, weren’t enough to deter a woman from having an affair with a secret lover. But once her husband found out, he decided to take legal action.

The Riverton man claims that the defendant, his wife’s illicit lover, did willfully and with intent lead to the destruction of the man’s family with his secretive acts. The affair went on from 2010 through 2011, eventually leading to the woman abandoning her husband and two children, Utah residents, to live with her lover in Idaho.

It may seem strange to hear of a lawsuit such as this, but Utah is actually only one of seven states that allow court claims of “alienation of affection.” The others are Mississippi, Hawaii, New Mexico, South Dakota, North Carolina, and Illinois. But alienation of affection is not the man’s only claim.

The scorned husband reports that he was entitled, within the marriage, to love, comfort, shared income, companionship, and services. He has filed claims for intentional affliction of emotional distress and punitive damages, for a total suit of $1.5 million.

But is it only about the money and revenge? It might appear so at the surface. But the lawsuit also states, “The defendant’s conduct is reprehensible, not acceptable by any standards in this community and should be made an example of.” Could this be the inspiration for similar suits in the years to come?

For more information about this story, see the KSL story here.

U.S. Bankruptcy History Part 3

December 28th, 2011

During the 1980s and 1990s, bankruptcy became a relatively common practice among individuals and businesses. Courts were flooded with bankruptcy cases and it became apparent that the bankruptcy was all too often being used as an easy way out. Many very large companies declared bankruptcy including Greyhound, Continental Airlines, and Pan Am. For the most part these were Chapter 11 reorganizations.

Because of the excessive number of cases however, pre-packaged bankruptcies became the practice, in which companies came to bankruptcy court having already agreed on certain terms with all its creditors. This saved time and helped bankruptcy courts keep up with the cases.

Still, President Clinton signed the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994 into law, to further expedite bankruptcy proceedings and to encourage the use of Chapter 13 bankruptcies for individuals, rather than the “all debts forgiven” practice of Chapter 7. This act also established the National Bankruptcy Review Commission.

After extensive study, in 1997, this commission published a detailed report on the uses and misuses of bankruptcy in the United States. This helped lead to the 2005 Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCA), signed by President George W. Bush.

This act helped curb the bankruptcy mills that taught individuals how to finagle the system to get a bankruptcy they didn’t really qualify for. It insisted that Americans who have something to pay will pay something to their debtors. But it also provided for those under median income who are not required to pay back their debts. Finally, bankruptcy use would be limited to every 8 years for Chapter 7, so people cannot keep racking up debt and filing bankruptcy.

The U.S. has a bankruptcy history going back to 1800, but it has taken until the most recent years for individuals and companies that are genuinely struggling to be able to apply for protection from creditors and be relieved of their burdensome debts.

U.S. Bankruptcy History Part 2

December 20th, 2011

In 1938, the Chandler Act added significant applications for businesses facing financial ruin. In the same year, Congress enacted Section 60e of the Bankruptcy Act, to give customers of businesses, rather than creditors, the first priority in claims over the insolvent business.

When in 1969 through 1970, brokerage houses began abusing the bankruptcy laws and shattering investor confidence, Congress had to act again. They put into law the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 to increase the accountability of brokers and dealers in the security trade and restore investor confidence.

At last, in 1978, the Bankruptcy Reform Act was passed, going into effect October 1st of 1979. This is the act that still stands today, governing current bankruptcy cases. And while it was not yet complete in its first year, the Bankruptcy Reform Act made bankruptcies and reorganization of financial affairs simpler for individuals and businesses alike.

When the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 was passed, it replaced the 1898 Act and the Chapters of that act and the Chandler Act amendment. Because this reform act was a significant change, it is understandable that controversy and conflict quickly arose.

As a result, the 1980s was a time of many new bankruptcy laws created as clarifications and amendments to the 1978 Act. For example, in 1980, the Bankruptcy Tax Act was passed, describing previously neglected issues of taxes in bankruptcy cases. Tax loss carry-forwards and rules for taxes on remaining assets were explained.

In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled that bankruptcy judges had been given power beyond that supported by the constitution. And in 1983, the Supreme Court ruled that companies should not be able to so easily terminate labor contract. Therefore, the Bankruptcy Amendment Act of 1984 narrowed and specified the powers of the bankruptcy judicial system.  It also reduced companies’ rights to end labor contracts.

Still, there were those who were not entitled to protection under bankruptcy. In 1986, family farmers and family fishermen were directly included in this protection with the advent of Chapter 12. This bankruptcy option allowed those that ran family crop, animal, or fish farms to keep their farm in spite of bankruptcy.

U.S. Bankruptcy History Part 1

December 14th, 2011

In the United States bankruptcies have only been available off and on and under specific conditions since 1800. Before that there were no options for a debtor who could not pay but prison and other punishments. While the first bankruptcy law was put into place in 1800, it was only in response to land speculation and was repealed just 3 years later.

Due to the financial panic in 1837, a second law for bankruptcies was put into place in 1841. But again, it was repealed just 2 years later. Concerns about the implications of bankruptcy as an option continued to prevent bankruptcy laws from being maintained.

Then, the Civil War caused significant economic distress. In response to this situation, Congress passed yet another bankruptcy law, in 1867. 2 years later, as with the first 2 laws, it was repealed. This law had been the first to include corporations, rather than just individual debtors.

Throughout the 1800s, laws enacted for bankruptcies were meant to serve the creditor and to find a way to get the owed money from the debtor. These were involuntary bankruptcies, meaning that they were imposed upon the debtor in arrears, rather than initiated by the debtor. These were punishing laws.

However, during the last 2 years of the century, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 was put into law, an act which did not focus on punishing the company in debt. Instead, the law was meant to help rehabilitate and reorganize companies in financial distress. The company could be put into “equity receivership” as a protection from creditors.

With the experience of the Great Depression and the universal suffering and financial ruin it caused, lawmakers increased their compassion towards the financially insolvent. Laws were enacted in both 1933 and 1934 with an emphasis on helping the unfortunate but honest debtor obtain a fresh start.

General History of Bankruptcy

December 3rd, 2011

Bankruptcy, like many words, stems from the ancient Latin vocabulary. The word “bancus” meant bench and “ruptus” meant broken. In old Italy, bankers operated in public markets or fairs, on a bench. This is where they exchanged monies and had dealings with the public.

If one of these bankers became insolvent and was no longer able to operate his business, he would break his bench to let the public know. This would alert his customers and public that he could no longer do business with them.

In Ancient Greece, there was no such thing as bankruptcy. Quite the contrary, if a man could not pay his debts, he, his wife, his children, and all of his servants would be turned over as debt slaves to the creditor. Once the creditor recouped his losses, through their labor, the debtor and his family could go free, but the debtor’s servants were usually kept by the creditor. Some city-states had laws protecting the life and limb of debt slaves and limiting the debt slavery to 5 years or less.

The Qur’an, of the Islamic people, is an ancient religious document. It teaches that men who are unable to pay their debts on time should be allowed time to pay these debts. The Qur’an states, “And if someone is in hardship, then let there be postponement until a time of ease. But if you give from your right as charity, then it is better for you, if you only knew.”

The Old Testament, or Torah, indicates that by Mosaic Law, every seventh year members of the community are released of their debts. Foreigners are not included in this law. But every 49th year (7 times 7), foreigners are also included in this “Year of Jubilee” when all debts are released. The Year of Jubilee is celebrated with the blowing of trumpets in Israel.

The first law to be enacted in England regarding bankruptcy, was put into effect in 1542. The Statute of Bankrupts, as it was called, dealt with insolvency in a harsh way, forcibly removing all of an individual’s belongings for creditors. A much harsher law, enacted in East Asia by Genghis Khan, called for the death of anyone who was bankrupt three times.

Thankfully, modern bankruptcy laws are significantly more lenient than this. And, instead of strictly punishing the debtor, many of these laws look to the possibilities of reorganization and resolution of an individual’s or company’s financial insolvency.